original article to the point and well worth reading
participants need to feel safe enough to argue with ideas, not with people
only then can you have world class performance, just "profitable" can be achieved without collaboration
in wibe terms you need several well formed arguments for and against. when voted on and sorted by energy you get a clear view of what direction is winning
participants need to feel safe enough to argue with ideas, not with people
only then can you have world class performance, just "profitable" can be achieved without collaboration
in wibe terms you need several well formed arguments for and against. when voted on and sorted by energy you get a clear view of what direction is winning
clipped from www.innovationtools.com
One management issue that could be killing innovation efforts is an obsession by many managers that a decision can’t be reached unless a team of people comes to agreement. Alfred Sloan of the "old GM" insisted that if his key managers came to agreement too quickly, or came to agreement at all, that they defer making a decision until a higher level of conflicting views were offered to the discussion.
Managers are not trained to look at conflict as a positive state, but without conflicting ideas all that is offered to customers are stale and uninspired offerings. |